ShareThis Page
Overhaul mental health care |

Overhaul mental health care

| Tuesday, December 1, 2015 9:00 p.m

U.S. Rep. Tim Murphy’s bill (the proposed Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act) calls for much needed reforms in the recognition and overall societal care of individuals suffering from serious mental health disorders.

Regrettably, many of these people are homeless or living in squalid conditions without medical care. A significant number of jail inmates throughout the country have been incarcerated because of petty crimes that were committed as a direct result of their psychiatric disordered rather than actual mens rea.

As a medical student and intern, I recall several mental health institutions that once existed in Allegheny County. As a forensic pathologist and coroner, I have dealt with numerous cases in which untreated psychiatric disorders resulted in tragic deaths.

A mental disease that seriously compromises someone in an emotional-behavioral manner requires appropriate medical diagnosis and treatment, just as do a vast variety of physical pathological processes. Properly staffed hospitals can provide that kind of care. Sidewalks, hillside dugouts and prisons are not beneficial to either mentally ill people or society.

We should do everything we can to support Murphy’s bill.

Cyril H. Wecht

Squirrel Hill

The writer is a former Allegheny County coroner.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.