ShareThis Page
Overtime goal gives Hounds much-needed win |

Overtime goal gives Hounds much-needed win

JoAnne Klimovich Harrop
| Saturday, June 1, 2002 12:00 p.m

The Riverhounds, who have been struggling offensively, got an overtime goal by forward David Flavius in the 93rd minute of Friday night’s game against Toronto. The Riverhounds defeated Toronto, 2-1, before 1,228 fans at Bethel Park Stadium in a battle of the bottom feeders in the Northeast Division of the Eastern Conference. The game was delayed 20 minutes because of a thunderstorm. After the heavy downpours had passed, the Riverhounds drought seemed to end, thanks to Flavius, who is now tied for the team lead in scoring last year.

“I guess I made up for missing a shot in the first half,” said Flavius, who scored his third goal of the season. “We came out attacking in the overtime. I was lucky to get the pass from B.J. (Johnson). The defender missed and I just got the shot off.”

Toronto, which is the only team the Riverhounds have beaten this season , gave the Riverhounds some extra help early, when defender Milan Kojic got ejected after receiving his second yellow card in the 14th minute. The Riverhounds (2-6-2, 10 pts.) trailed 1-0 at that time after Aristo Knights scored the game’s first goal in the sixth minute.

Toronto (1-5-1, 5pts) appeared to be in control, until Kojic got thrown out.

“Sometimes, when you are the team playing a man-down it energizes you,” Riverhounds coach Kai Haaskivi said. “Give credit to Toronto. They battled the entire game with a man down.”

The Riverhounds took advantage of the man-advantage when Jeff Houser scored the Riverhounds first goal, a shot from 25 yards out in the 39th minute off a pass from Joey Worthen to tie the score 1-1.

Prior to that, the Riverhounds had a goal taken away on an offsides call in the 31st minute. Midfielder Gary DePalma had a beautiful corner shot which was deflected by teammate and defender Michael Green and rolled past the outstretched hands of Toronto goalkeeper Theo Zagar. DePalma argued with the official’s decision and was given a yellow card. The Riverhounds had 14 shots on the night to Toronto’s seven.

“It was not a question of us not having opportunities to score,” Haaskivi said. “It was just a question of finishing our chances. We had plenty of chances to score, and we took advantage of the two that count.”

The Riverhounds got their first overtime win in five extra session games, which pleased Haaskivi, who hasn’t had much to smile about lately. His team also moves into second place in the division, behind Rochester, which lost to Milwaukee last night.

“I don’t care who scores the goal, just that one of our guys got the game-winner,” Haaskivi said. “Flavius has been working really hard for us. He missed his chance in the second minute (of regulation), but came through in the second minute of overtime.”

Prior to last night, the Riverhounds had only scored seven goals in their first nine games.

“I really wanted to score early in the overtime,” Flavius said. “I think Toronto was happy to play for a tie, especially with a man down. But I wanted the win and knew the minute I scored the game was over.”

JoAnne Klimovich Harrop is a Tribune-Review fashion writer. You can contact JoAnne at 412-320-7889, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.