Archive

ShareThis Page
Pa. Gov.-elect Wolf to impose ‘No, thank you’ rule on appointees | TribLIVE.com
News

Pa. Gov.-elect Wolf to impose ‘No, thank you’ rule on appointees

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:38 p.m
PTRCLINTON05102814
Justin Merriman | Trib Total Media
Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate Tom Wolf speaks during an event at the IBEW union hall on the South Side on Monday, October 27, 2014.

HARRISBURG — A code of ethical conduct for Gov.-elect Tom Wolf’s transition team foreshadows something Wolf plans to impose on his first day as governor: a gift ban on his appointees and executive branch employees.

It’s called the “No, thank you” rule, said Wolf spokesman Jeffrey Sheridan. “Anyone who works for him in the executive branch will not be able to accept a gift.”

Wolf plans to sign an executive order to prohibit gifts, even though state law allows officials to accept gifts worth up to $250 without reporting them, or gifts worth more than that amount if disclosed. The law sets a $650 threshold for travel, hospitality and lodging.

Critics during Republican Gov. Tom Corbett’s campaign pointed to his acceptance of legally allowed gifts, totaling more than $28,000 during his tenure, from tickets to sporting events and Broadway shows to a free yacht vacation.

Wolf, a Democrat, will be inaugurated as Corbett’s successor on Jan. 20.

In his Campaign for a Fresh Start, Wolf spelled out his rule on gifts — for himself, his Governor’s Office staff and his appointees to state agencies and boards:

“The rule will be easy to apply and easy to report — no free lunches, no free tickets to ball games, and no free trips to conferences or vacation resorts. If you come and work for Tom Wolf in Harrisburg, there will be no ‘gifts’ as part of your job.”

Barry Kauffman, lobbyist for Common Cause of Pennsylvania, said the rule is “strong incentive to do the right thing. It means you’ll be beholden to no one.”

Common Cause long has sought a gift ban in state law, without success.

A scandal that unfolded this year revealed an undercover lobbyist working for the Attorney General’s office had recorded four Philadelphia legislators taking thousands of dollars in cash. A former Philadelphia Traffic Court judge is accused of accepting a $2,000 bracelet. She has been charged with bribery by the Philadelphia district attorney, whose office continues to investigate the legislators.

An executive order won’t keep employees from taking gifts, Kauffman said — “if they want to put their jobs on the line.”

The ban would not apply to the Legislature. That’s why Common Cause wants an across-the-board law.

The late Gov. Robert P. Casey, a Democrat, imposed a similar gift ban and, said Kauffman, “he enforced it, too.”

Katie McGinty, Wolf’s chief of staff, on Monday became the first to sign the code of conduct. Broader than just gifts, it requires disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and includes a pledge not to use a government position for personal gain. The statement says the signatory will be “impartial and beholden to the people.”

Incoming members of Wolf’s administration will sign the ethics form, Sheridan said. The executive order banning gifts will solidify that provision for people he brings in and executive branch employees.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’s state Capitol writer. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or bbumsted@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.