PA Institute of CPAs honors Trib reporters for '$ecret Economy' work |

PA Institute of CPAs honors Trib reporters for '$ecret Economy' work

The Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants will honor Tribune-Review investigative reporters Andrew Conte and Lou Kilzer for their “$ecret Economy” work showing how anyone can establish a shell corporation and hide money in an offshore bank account for less than $1,000.

The institute recognized the Trib story “Offshore Accounts Relatively Easy to Open,” ( ), published Oct. 6, 2012, with its Truth in Finances Award.

The award “honors excellent, balanced reporting that clarifies financial issues, uncovers financial fraud, or exposes fraudulent activities that harm the financial wellbeing of individuals, communities, or corporations.”

$hadow Economy was a series of stories last year revealing the impacts of corporations and individuals hiding money in offshore accounts. More than half of the world's cash — more than $20 trillion — passes through financial havens in more than 70 jurisdictions worldwide that hide it from tax collectors, shareholders, partners and wives.

The series explained the drain these secret accounts have on economies, hindering growth for poorer nations, and how laws in some states make the United States a hiding place for cash for many Latin Americans and Chinese. Read the series at

Conte and Kilzer will share a $500 cash award and be recognized at the Pennsylvania Newspaper Association's Newspaper of the Year brunch on Nov. 8 at The Sands Resort & Casino in Bethlehem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.