Pa. Senate approves Cortes as secretary of Commonwealth |

Pa. Senate approves Cortes as secretary of Commonwealth

Pedro A. Cortes is secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

HARRISBURG — The state Senate on Tuesday approved Pedro Cortes for secretary of the Commonwealth, despite questions about his claims he knew nothing about a “house of horrors” run by a Philadelphia abortion clinic doctor convicted of murder.

The Republican-controlled chamber voted 31-18 for the Cabinet nominee of Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf.

“We’re obviously very pleased he was confirmed,” said Jeffrey Sheridan, Wolf’s spokesman. “He is very qualified and experienced, and fully able to run the department.”

Cortes served in the post under former Gov. Ed Rendell. The agency oversees elections, campaign finance reports, lobbyist registration, corporate filings and 29 state licensing boards for professionals.

At his confirmation hearing last month, Cortes told senators he had no knowledge of former Dr. Kermit Gosnell’s criminal activities when Cortes was secretary of the Department of State from 2003 to 2010 under Rendell. The department oversees the medical board that licenses doctors.

The Department of Health regulates clinics.

A drug raid in 2010 uncovered the clinic that authorities described as filthy, with untrained staff. Evidence showed Gosnell liberally doled out prescriptions for painkillers. A grand jury found the state Health Department last inspected the clinic in 1992.

“It’s very rare I don’t vote to confirm a nominee of any party,” said Sen. John Eichelberger, R-Altoona. But he said of Cortes, “I am very concerned about his ability to lead and his ability to manage.”

But Sen. Ron Teplitz, D-Harrisburg, described Cortes as “a distinguished public servant” who is “the most experienced person who could be considered for this position.”

Cortes said he interpreted a court ruling as holding that even the secretary could not know about pending medical board investigations or cases that weren’t acted upon.

“We have a very different view than he does” on that issue, Eichelberger said.

He said that appeared to be an “excuse he’s using to deflect responsibility on the Gosnell matter.”

Former Gov. Tom Corbett, a Republican, fired staffers of the Department of State and Department of Health when the Gosnell grand jury released its report in 2011.

The Senate State Government Committee last month took the unusual step of voting “no recommendation” after Cortes’ hearing, but the panel decided to let the full Senate vote rather than block his nomination.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’s state Capitol reporter. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.