ShareThis Page
Panel to review anti-smoking law |

Panel to review anti-smoking law

| Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:00 a.m

Hosni Shadid, 24, has been smoking for six years and likes being able to have a cigarette in his favorite bars.

However, the Bellevue man supports a proposed ordinance by Allegheny County Council to ban smoking in workplaces — including bars and restaurants.

“I think it will help people quit,” the project manager for Mellon Bank said as he stood outside One Mellon Center, Downtown, on a smoke break. “A lot of people tend to start smoking when they’re in bars, drinking alcohol.”

Council Wednesday night voted to send an anti-smoking ordinance to its Health and Human Services Committee. Council will be on summer break for several weeks, but committee chairman Mike Finnerty, D-Scott, said he would convene the panel and make a recommendation by July 22.

Council President Rich Fitzgerald, D-Squirrel Hill, proposed the ordinance after a similar bill failed to clear committee in the state Legislature.

If passed, the ordinance would outlaw smoking in certain public places, workplaces and set fines for violations.

Fifteen states have banned smoking, but the degree varies, and 40 states have at least one county or city that has banned or limited smoking.

Last month, the U.S. Surgeon General released a report detailing the dangers of secondhand smoke, stating there is no safe level of exposure. Patronizing smoke-free restaurants was recommended.

In light of that report and several others, the Pennsylvania Restaurant Association recently reversed its position and supported a statewide ban on smoking, said its president, Carlton owner Kevin Joyce.

However, Joyce said, support for the ban rests on a total ban in every establishment, with no special exceptions for private clubs or casinos.

“The key is a level playing field,” Joyce said. “With a level playing field, there’s less a chance of people taking their business elsewhere.”

While he could see the ordinance’s merit in protecting his employees’ health, Jim Mitchell, owner of Mitchell’s restaurant, Downtown, questioned why the government was telling a private business owner what to do.

“They’re politicians, not businessmen,” Mitchell said. “It would kill my businesses if my smokers who drink went to private clubs.”

Tom Shelpman, 60, of Brookline, is a Mitchell’s regular and enjoys having a smoke with his glass of beer.

“They’re taking our rights away,” he said.

Another patron, Zepp Rosselli, 31, of Brighton Heights, asked Shelpman “What about my rights?”

Shelpman replied, “You don’t have to sit in a bar.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.