Parents had been suspects in abuse |

Parents had been suspects in abuse

The Associated Press

ATLANTA — A Georgia couple accused of locking their teenage son in a bedroom for years with little food had been investigated for other abuse.

Paul and Sheila Comer were arrested last week when 18-year-old Mitch Comer was found at a Los Angeles bus station. He told authorities his stepfather gave him $200 and a list of homeless shelters before he was put on a bus to the city on his 18th birthday.

According to a report from the time, state child welfare officials in February 2009 alerted the Cherokee County Sheriff’s office to an abuse accusation about the Comers. The incident report says the couple’s son claimed his parents made him get on his knees and rest his head against a wall with his hands behind him for hours at a time. The boy also claimed his father spanked him with a belt for no reason.

The sheriff’s office closed the case, considering the accusation unfounded.

On Sept. 11, a retired police sergeant working security at a downtown Los Angeles bus station noticed Mitch Comer. Police decided to investigate further because the 87-pound teenage boy stood just over 5 feet tall and looked much younger, Los Angeles police said last week. The teen told authorities he had suffered years of abuse after being taken out of school in the eighth grade.

Arrest warrants filed Sept. 12 and 13 in Georgia say the Comers, who now live in Paulding County, “made Mitch kneel on the floor, bend his head and place his forehead against the wall, and place his hands behind his head for long periods of time.” The boy said he was fed small quantities of food daily, Los Angeles police said.

Stepfather Paul Comer and mother Sheila Comer are held on charges of false imprisonment and cruelty to children, Paulding County jail records show. They are being held without bond pending a hearing Oct. 4.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.