Patent telework program invites abuse, watchdog says |

Patent telework program invites abuse, watchdog says

WASHINGTON — A top government investigator told lawmakers Tuesday that a lax culture at the Patent and Trademark Office “tolerates” serious employee abuses, including fraudulent claims by patent examiners about the hours they put in when they work from home.

In testimony before a House hearing, Commerce Department Inspector General Todd Zinser said the agency’s award-winning telework program — under which about half the 8,300 patent examiners work from home — has a dark side, because managers are prevented from punishing employees who abuse the freedom they have.

Zinser offered his assessment at a rare joint hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the House Judiciary Committee, which are looking into wrongdoing discovered last year during an internal investigation.

Zinser said his office is investigating a dozen fresh reports of fraud by patent examiners. One case allegedly involves an examiner who claimed more than 300 hours of work but was not fired. Another examiner allegedly falsified time and attendance records at a cost to the government of more than $24,000. In other cases, examiners’ violations were reported by lower-level supervisors, then “disregarded by more senior management.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.