‘Pelosi is not (Dems’) problem,’ Doyle says |

‘Pelosi is not (Dems’) problem,’ Doyle says

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Friday she plans to run for minority leader, a decision that split some of Western Pennsylvania’s House Democrats.

Republicans, who won control of the House in the election, used Pelosi’s name and image in campaign ads against Democrats across the country, including Reps. Jason Altmire of McCandless, Mark Critz of Johnstown and Kathy Dahlkemper of Erie.

Altmire and Critz won re-election Tuesday, but Butler Republican Mike Kelly beat Dahlkemper.

Democratic Rep. Mike Doyle of Forest Hills said Pelosi, the first female speaker, is an effective leader and was unfairly demonized.

“If she runs, she wins, and that would be fine with me,” Doyle said two days before Pelosi announced her decision. “… They tried to demonize the president and that didn’t work, so they moved on to Nancy and, for some reason, that stuck.

“Nancy Pelosi is not our problem. We didn’t do a good enough job explaining (Democratic accomplishments) to the American people.”

Altmire said he wouldn’t vote for Pelosi as leader, even if Democrats had retained control of the House.

“I don’t know if there’s going to be another candidate or not, but I’m not going to vote for her,” he said. “I would like to see a moderate, someone who understands why the (election) results occurred in the first place. I don’t believe Speaker Pelosi fits that description.”

Critz and Dahlkemper could not be reached.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.