ShareThis Page
Penguins coach Bylsma will buck tradition with goaltender Fleury |

Penguins coach Bylsma will buck tradition with goaltender Fleury

| Tuesday, April 17, 2012 12:00 a.m

VOORHEES, N.J. — Penguins coach Dan Bylsma doesn’t usually converse with Marc-Andre Fleury before games. Goalies are a different breed, and leaving them alone with their thoughts is a coaching tradition that Bylsma generally follows.

Not this time. Not when times are this desperate, and not when Fleury’s thoughts are consumed by negativity.

“I will be speaking with him,” Bylsma said Monday, an off-day for the Penguins during Round 1 of the Stanley Cup playoffs. “As we go forward here, I think it’s imperative that if we are going to scratch back in the series and get in this thing, it’s going to be on the strength of Marc-Andre Fleury in our net.”

Bylsma was quick to point out that the Penguins’ goal-prevention issues against the Philadelphia Flyers are not all traceable to Fleury.

“I also know that, the situation he’s in, is there’s 18 guys in front of him that haven’t been there, to a man, for him in some difficult situations,” Bylsma said.

But he also acknowledged that “The Flower” has wilted badly this spring.

“So that conversation will happen,” Bylsma said. “How we regroup and how we come back and play • (it’s) not just Marc-Andre Fleury, but certainly we need the strength of him going forward in the next four games.”

For the second consecutive day, Bylsma referenced the Penguins having “four more games” in this series. Only three teams in NHL history — the 1942 Maple Leafs, ’75 Islanders and 2010 Flyers — have come back from a three-game deficit to win a series.

Many of the Penguins believe the two-day break in between Games 3 and 4 can be a blessing.

“The longer,” right wing Pascal Dupuis said, “the better.”

The Flyers, though, don’t seem likely to let up.

“It’s irrelevant,” Flyers coach Peter Laviolette said about the delay before Game 4. “It’s irrelevant. It’s irrelevant. It’s irrelevant. We will focus on practice (Tuesday) and then the game. That’s all.”

No team coming back from a three-game deficit has been battered quite like the Penguins. Fleury has allowed 17 goals through three games, which is one shy of the NHL record for goals allowed in the first three games of a series.

“We still have hope,” said defenseman Zbynek Michalek, who has consistently stated this season that he considers Fleury the NHL’s finest goalie. “We believe in him.”

Fleury has bounced back from gruesome performances in the past. He was yanked in Game 5 of the 2009 Stanley Cup Final in Detroit, only to rebound with two marvelous performances in consecutive 2-1 victories to win the Stanley Cup.

Now, a more daunting task — “A huge mountain,” center Jordan Staal called it — faces Fleury and the Penguins.

“It has been done before,” defenseman Matt Niskanen said. “Yeah, we know it’s going to be tough. But we’re never going to go down without playing our best game. We’ve got the guys to do it.”

Photo Galleries

Game 3 Pens vs. Flyers 4/15/12

Game 3 Pens vs. Flyers 4/15/12

The Pittsburgh Penguins lose 8-4 against the Philadelphia Flyers, Sunday, April 15 at the Wells Fargo Center in Game 3 of their Stanley Cup playoff series.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.