ShareThis Page
Penguins embarrassed by Lightning |

Penguins embarrassed by Lightning

Karen Price
| Sunday, November 9, 2003 12:00 a.m

TAMPA – When the lunar eclipse hit its peak outside the St. Pete Times Forum around 8 p.m. on Saturday night, the Penguins’ meltdown inside was just getting underway.

An hour later, it, too, was at its peak. The Tampa Bay Lightning scored three goals in four-and-a-half minutes late in the second period to blow open the game and take a five-goal lead into the third period. Then they added four more in the third period to hand the Penguins a 9-0 loss, their worst since falling, 9-0, to the New Jersey Devils on Oct. 28, 2000.

“At the beginning of the year I talked about those 20 games a year when you’re not really good,” said coach Eddie Olczyk, who paced the hallway for several minutes after the game before going in to talk to the players. “The fear was that it was going to get out of hand because we just did not have it, and (the Lightning) had it.”

The game started in the now all-too-familiar fashion, with the Penguins falling behind early, in the all-too-familiar way of botched coverage in their own end leaving an opponent wide open. It ended after goaltender Sebastien Caron was pulled after giving up the eighth goal of the game and Marc-Andre Fleury came in to give up the ninth and final Lightning goal to Ruslan Fedotenko.

In between, the Penguins (3-7-3-0) had 15 shots on goal, Lightning forward Vincent Lecavalier scored his second career hat trick against the Penguins, including one short-handed goal to bring the Penguins’ league-worst total to seven. The Penguins took 11 penalties for a total of 41 minutes, including a misconduct to Martin Straka for having words with the referee. And they were shut out for the second time this season by one of the best teams in the NHL.

“This is as bad as it can get, yes,” said defenseman Marc Bergevin, one of three players to end up even instead of minus in the game. “Obviously the message didn’t get through. … We got embarrassed, 9-0.”

The game was over long before it got completely out of hand, however. It was over in the first period, when the Penguins were unable to score — or to really pose much of a threat – on a seven-minute power play while trailing by just one goal.

They managed a handful of shots, but nothing that came close to challenging Nikolai Khabibulin, the NHL’s defensive player of the month for October.

After that, Fredrik Modin scored to make it 2-0 after a 3-on-2 break with 17 seconds left in the period.

“We got seven minutes power play and that’s the game right there,” Straka said. “We got a couple shots, that’s all. You have to score if you want to win the game. You have to score on the power play, especially if you have seven minutes. And we didn’t. Then they get one chance and they score a goal.”

Lecavalier scored his first of the night after he took the puck right off the stick of defenseman Dan Focht about 15 feet in front of the Penguins’ net for a shorthanded breakaway to start the second-period onslaught. The Lightning were coming off two losses in a row after starting the season 7-0-1-0.

Caron appeared to be injured just before that, requiring a visit from trainer Scott Johnson. He continued to play.

“I just got him out of there because he didn’t need to be … that’s the only reason,” Olczyk said.

Karen Price is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.