ShareThis Page
Penguins fall 4-1 to Columbus |

Penguins fall 4-1 to Columbus

Josh Yohe
| Wednesday, February 9, 2011 12:00 a.m

The Penguins are one win away from giving coach Dan Bylsma his 100th career victory.

It sure feels like they’re even closer to a damaging losing streak.

Playing without their two best players — and throw Chris Kunitz’s name onto the injury list — the Penguins were feeble offensively for a second straight game in a 4-1 loss to Columbus at Consol Energy Center.

They weren’t much better defensively.

With nine of their next 12 games on the road, and Sidney Crosby apparently not close to returning, the question now becomes, how do the Penguins avoid what could be an inevitable losing skid?

“We just need to regroup,” defenseman Zbynek Michalek said. “We have to learn from these last two games. We’ve played well without them (Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin) before. We need to do it again.”

Playing sound defensive hockey over the next stretch of games seems mandatory.

Such solid defensive play has been a theme most of the season but wasn’t evident against the Blue Jackets. Columbus enjoyed an array of odd-man rushes against Marc-Andre Fleury, who made a number of quality saves but allowed four goals for the first time since Nov. 19.

“When you’re not scoring goals, it makes it (defensive breakdowns) that much worse,” right wing Craig Adams said. “We just need to play better. We didn’t play well enough to win these last two games. We weren’t horrible, but we weren’t nearly good enough.”

Columbus silenced the home crowd by taking a 3-0 lead into the third period before Tyler Kennedy’s 10th goal helped the Penguins avoid consecutive shutouts.

Eric Tangradi, who was scheduled to be a healthy scratch before Kunitz’s lower body injury forced him into the lineup, probably enjoyed the Penguins’ two best scoring opportunities. His wrist shot from the slot was stopped by Columbus goalie Steve Mason in the second period. Later in that period, Mason coughed up the puck to Tangradi in the goalmouth, but the left wing didn’t get much wood on his shot, allowing Mason time to make the save.

“It was such of a spur of the moment play,” Tangradi said. “You don’t really expect to get the puck there.”

Columbus star Rick Nash started the scoring 6:07 into the game when he fired a laser from a bad angle that beat Fleury. Samuel Pahlsson and Jakub Voracek scored in the second period to break the game open for the Blue Jackets.

Antoine Vermette’s goal came six minutes after Kennedy pulled the Penguins within two.

Bylsma and some of his players commented that the Penguins made the game too complicated against Columbus.

“We need to get the puck deep and start making simple plays,” Michalek said. “With Sid and Geno out, that’s how we need to play.”

Bylsma juggled some line combinations and will surely contemplate ways to generate offense during today’s off-day.

“We’ll continue to look for lines and people who are able and willing to get to the offensive zone,” he said. “I think the players we have on the ice right now can do a better job of getting to the blue paint.”

The Penguins won in Columbus in December, 7-1. Of course, those were different times, as Crosby was launching an assault on the league, and the Penguins looked invincible.

Nine of their next 12 games are on the road, with the only three home games in that stretch against talented teams in Los Angeles, Washington and San Jose.

Panic time?

“No,” Adams said. “We can’t worry about the next 12. We just have to get ready for L.A.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.