ShareThis Page
Penguins’ home sellout streak hits 100 |

Penguins’ home sellout streak hits 100

Rob Rossi
| Monday, March 16, 2009 12:00 a.m

Life is good these days for Penguins president David Morehouse, whose franchise played before its 100th consecutive sellout crowd Sunday.

Extending that streak into next season, the last for NHL hockey at Mellon Arena before Consol Energy Center opens in 2010, will prove a challenge.

“Money is tight (for fans) and I’m sure the economic crisis is going to have an impact,” Morehouse said yesterday. “Right now, we haven’t seen it.”

The Penguins will play before sellout crowds in seven remaining regular-season home games, Morehouse said. He added that sales of season-ticket packages for next season are “on track” to be capped at 14,000, as was the case this season for the first time in franchise history.

In its second season, the Penguins’ season-ticket waiting list tops 2,000 applicants.

Defenseman Brooks Orpik, the second-longest tenured player on the team, said yesterday he is “not surprised at all” with the sellout streak that dates to Feb. 14, 2007.

“The first couple of years, as bad as we were, I thought the fan support we got was great,” Orpik said of the years 2002-04, when the Penguins averaged 13,316 fans over 82 home games during consecutive seasons of last-place finishes.

“No matter where you go, you’re going to have fair-weather fans, but back then we had a great group of loyal fans. I’ve always thought our fans were real good, but compared to now — well, now it’s at another level.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.