ShareThis Page
Penguins insider: Tone set? |

Penguins insider: Tone set?

Rob Rossi
| Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:00 a.m

Burning question: Does Game 1 set the tone for a series?

Breakdown: Teams that won Game 1 claimed 13-of-15 series in the 2007 Stanley Cup playoffs, including all eight in the opening round.

He said it: “You have to win games, it’s as simple as that,” forward Pascal Dupuis said. “The first one is important, but so is the second, third and fourth. Losing Game 1 doesn’t doom you, but it can set the tone.”

Looking ahead: Defenseman Brooks Orpik believes home-ice advantage is as much about practice-day routine as playing in front of supportive fans.

“Last year in Ottawa there was nothing to do,” Orpik said. “At this point in the season, you want to get away and clear your mind. That is just as beneficial as anything, and it’s easier to find those places to get away at home.”

The Penguins will not travel to Ottawa for Game 3 until after a late-morning practice Sunday – giving them a full week in Pittsburgh before arriving in Canada, where intense media focus will create what right wing Marian Hossa calls “the playoff bubble.”

“I don’t know if it ever gets normal in the playoffs,” Orpik said. “But it’s definitely closer to normal when you’re home.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.