ShareThis Page
Penguins insider: Who benefits most from break between games? |

Penguins insider: Who benefits most from break between games?

| Sunday, April 13, 2008 12:00 a.m

Burning question: Which club benefits most from two days between games?

Breakdown: The Penguins want to carry momentum from wins in Games 1 and 2 into Game 3 on Monday. The Senators hope the weekend provides enough time to regroup and dull the Penguins’ enthusiasm.

PuckSpeak: “If you’re playing well, you want to be right back into it the next day,” defenseman Darryl Sydor said. “As long as you have the right focus on that second day off, there should be no disadvantage. It’s a little early in the series to have a couple of days off, but it’s nice to have.”

Looking ahead: Sydor, a tested playoff veteran that has appeared in four Stanley Cup finals, said the most oft-overlooked aspect of the playoffs is the emotional toll it takes on players.

“It wears on you physically, but a lot of people don’t know how it wears on you mentally,” Sydor said. “That’s why it was good a lot of the guys didn’t come to the rink (Saturday). They’ll be refreshed today.”

Sydor did not dress for Games 1 and 2 and is unlikely to appear in Game 3. However, one point coach Michel Therrien will emphasize to his defensemen today at practice will be crease protection. Ottawa’s best scoring chances this series, including each of its three goals in Game 2, were the result of its forwards winning battles with defensemen in front of goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury.

Additional Information:

Gigapan Interactives

Click here to launch

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.