Penguins trim roster to 34 |

Penguins trim roster to 34

Karen Price

The Penguins reduced the training camp roster to a total of 34 players Wednesday, assigning seven players to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton and one to juniors.

Forwards Tomas Surovy, Guillaume Lefebvre, Michal Sivek, Toby Petersen, Shane Endicott and Matt Hussey and defenseman Brendan Buckley were sent to Wilkes-Barre of the AHL following yesterday’s practices, and defenseman Paul Bissonnette was returned to Saginaw of the OHL.

“Some of the players were very emotional, and some players were very understanding and know what they have to do,” coach Eddie Olczyk said. “People can argue with the decisions we’ve made, but we feel at this particular time that the guys we sent to Wilkes-Barre, it’s what needs to be done.”

Surovy, Lefebvre and Sivek all saw time with the Penguins last season. Bissonnette, 18, was perhaps the biggest surprise of training camp, staying on a week after most junior players were returned.

“(Bissonnette) had the demeanor and the mind-set of he wanted to be here,” Olczyk said. “And that bodes well for us for the future. There’s no reason why this kid shouldn’t go down to juniors and be a force and play on the World Junior Team.”

The Penguins are left with 19 forwards, 11 defenseman and four goaltenders.

  • Notes: Olczyk gave only a hint yesterday when asked if Mario Lemieux would play in an exhibition game this weekend, perhaps Friday at Mellon Arena. “I think we’ll be able to better make a comment on that (today),” Olczyk said.

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.