ShareThis Page
Penn State offense shows new wrinkles |

Penn State offense shows new wrinkles

| Monday, November 21, 2011 12:00 a.m

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Penn State’s use of the Wildcat formation took players, fans and Ohio State by surprise.

A Nittany Lions team built to run up the gut and one that typically takes an ultra-conservative offensive approach claims it didn’t risk much by showing its hand against the Buckeyes on Saturday.

Penn State’s game next Saturday at Wisconsin gives the winner a berth in the Big Ten Championship.

While the Nittany Lions’ 20-14 win over Ohio State didn’t directly impact the ramifications of the Wisconsin game, interim head coach Tom Bradley said he didn’t show too much of the new offensive wrinkle.

“Hey, I’m a defensive coach, so I’ve seen all the tricks,” he said. “They’re going to have to figure out what I have. I’ve watched all the different things people have done against me over the last 12 years, and I never forgot them.”

Bradley said time and again, he’s not as involved with the offense as he would like to be. But certainly he’s taken notice of his playmakers.

Athletic wide receivers Curtis Drake and Bill Belton, both high school quarterbacks, give the Nittany Lions options in the Wildcat. Since Bradley took over two weeks ago, quarterback Matt McGloin has caught a pass, and the Wildcat was brought back into the fold.

“It surprised other teams, and it surprised our team,” Drake said. “We came in after the game, and they guys are like, ‘Man, we used the Wildcat?’ We had so much success with it, too.”

Despite the stakes being so high in Madison, Wisc., Penn State players have faith Bradley will come up with a strong game plan.

“This game means everything,” senior Drew Astorino said. “This game is the culmination of our whole entire season, so it’s a big game.”

Road tested

The Beaver Stadium crowd has been good for Penn State, but it has been dominant on the road, too.

Boasting a 4-0 record in road games against Temple, Indiana, Northwestern and Ohio State this season, the Nittany Lions head to Madison with an us-against-the-world type mentality.

Tackle Chima Okoli said winning Saturday should give Penn State momentum.

“I’m not a big bowl prediction, bracket prediction kind of guy. You win, and the numbers speak for themselves,” Okoli said. “When you keep winning, you put yourself in the best possible position and let the cards fall where they may.”

Forward thinking

Moments after walking off the field and congratulating the players, quarterbacks coach Jay Paterno spoke about the upcoming trip to Wisconsin.

He spoke of the environment at Camp Randall and Wisconsin’s ground game, and he wasn’t the only one thinking about the regular season finale.

Players said it won’t take much for them to get refocused for the Badgers, a game that they have had circled on their calendars since August.

“As I’ve been trained my whole life, I immediately started thinking about next week,” Paterno said. “We’re in the Big Ten semifinals, essentially, next week, so I started thinking about Wisconsin, and I’ll have some nightmares (tonight).”

Additional Information:

A look ahead

Penn State (9-2, 6-1 Big Ten)

Next opponent: Wisconsin (9-2, 5-2 Big Ten)

Time and place: 3:30 p.m. Camp Randall, Madison, Wisc.

Scouting report: The stakes can’t get much higher for the regular season finale. The Lions finish the toughest three-game stretch of their schedule and need a win to claim the Leader’s Division crown and punch their ticket to the inaugural Big Ten Championship game.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.