ShareThis Page
Penn State women advance to semis |

Penn State women advance to semis

Staff And Wire Reports
| Saturday, March 5, 2011 12:00 a.m

INDIANAPOLIS — It was a sweet homecoming for Alex Bentley.

The Penn State sophomore guard, who attended nearby Ben Davis High School, scored 19 points to lead the second-seeded Nittany Lions to a 73-61 victory over No. 7 seed Purdue in the Big Ten Tournament quarterfinals Friday at Conseco Fieldhouse.

“It’s a great feeling to come back home and be in a familiar place,” said Bentley, who had about 35 friends and family members in attendance. “It’s just icing on the cake to play here.”

Julia Trogele and Maggie Lucas each scored 12, and Nikki Greene grabbed 14 rebounds for the Nittany Lions (23-8), who advanced to Saturday’s semifinals and will play No. 11 seed Illinois, which upset No. 3 seed Michigan, 55-47.

The Nittany Lions, who trailed, 31-30, at halftime, used an 11-3 run midway through the second half to open a 55-44 lead. Penn State hit three 3-pointers during the spurt, including two by Lucas. The Boilermakers (20-11), who lost in the quarterfinals for the second year in a row after reaching four consecutive tournament finals, didn’t get closer than seven the rest of the way.

Division III men’s tournament

Manchester 70, Bethany 58 — Ryan McFadden scored a team-high 18 points in 13 minutes off the bench, but Bethany (21-8) lost its first-round game to Manchester. Tyler Delauder led Manchester (22-6) with 23 points.

Rhode Island College 83, Penn State Behrend 54 — Antone Gray’s 19 points led Rhode Island College (20-7). Justin Kovac led Penn State Behrend (23-5) with 17 points.

Division III women’s tournament

Juniata 62, Gallaudet 45 — Erin McGinley scored 14 points, and Jordan Speck had 11 in Juniata’s first-round win. Juniata (22-6) will play Greensboro in the second round today.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.