ShareThis Page
Penn-Trafford field hockey team’s offense picks up in second half |

Penn-Trafford field hockey team’s offense picks up in second half

Doug Gulasy
| Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:00 p.m
Lillian DeDomenic | For the Penn-Trafford Star
Penn-Trafford junior Karen Postupac prepares to insert a corner during a game against Norwin on Sept. 24, 2013, at Warrior Stadium.

Penn-Trafford field hockey coach Cindy Dutt had some concerns with the state of her team’s offense at the midway point of the season.

Those concerns lessened down the stretch.

The Warriors (12-4) scored 36 goals over the final 10 games of the season, including two contests apiece where they scored four, five and seven goals.

While the team missed the playoffs after winning the WPIAL Class AAA title in 2011 and finishing as the runner-up last season, Dutt saw plenty of reason to be optimistic moving forward.

“I can say that all of us — all of the girls — were disappointed we didn’t make it in the playoffs,” Dutt said. “I still consider it a very successful season because we went 12-4, and we lost to two teams I think are the best in the WPIAL this year (two losses each to section opponents Pine-Richland and North Allegheny).

“ … I think we did very well. There’s a lot more competition in our section.”

While the team’s defense played a strong role all season, the offense picked it up in the second half of the year.

Coming into the season, the Warriors were tasked with the chore of replacing Amanda Steffey, the leading scorer in the state last season. The team scored 10 goals in the first six games of the season, going 4-2 in those games.

While Penn-Trafford was shut out twice during the second half of the season, against Pine-Richland and North Allegheny, Dutt said she saw a number of players step up to contribute on the score sheet, including seniors Morgan LeVeille and Angela Sciulli and juniors Kat Hier and Isabel Siergiej.

“My forwards did finish pretty strong,” Dutt said. “We were able to work in a couple of the (junior varsity) players, and I think they worked out well.”

In addition to the scoring uptick, Dutt said she was “completely thrilled” with the way the defense played. Goalkeeper Jessica Wisniewski suffered a concussion in the second half of the season, and sophomore Christina Bauer stepped into the starting lineup in her place.

“The defense worked with (Bauer) beautifully,” Dutt said. “And I thought our midfield was really strong. I was comfortable with our bench. I was really, really happy with the way we played.”

Penn-Trafford will lose many of its strong defensive players heading into next season, as six starters will graduate from this year’s team.

That includes the entire starting backfield as well as two of the three forwards.

Graduating seniors include Tori Lago, LeVeille, Lindsay Loughner, Taylor Nedley, Sciulli and Wisniewski.

“They brought a lot of cadence and calm to the play,” Dutt said. “There was no one really overanxious or agitated about pushing the play. I thought they were more calm motivators.”

Penn-Trafford will have a strong crop of incoming seniors next year with the likes of Hier, Siergiej, Julie Donald and Anna Taylor. The current underclassmen will look to take Penn-Trafford back to the postseason.

“I think the young girls are motivated,” Dutt said. “I think next year could be a very good year as well. … We have a solid midfield, and I’m thrilled about that, but we have to really push and develop some of those underclassmen to take up the slack.”

Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830, via email at or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.

Doug Gulasy is a Tribune-Review sports reporter. You can contact Doug at 412-388-5830, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.