ShareThis Page
Penn-Trafford wins title in thriller |

Penn-Trafford wins title in thriller

| Sunday, February 5, 2006 12:00 a.m

The Penn-Trafford wrestling team needed a spark Saturday night in the WPIAL Class AAA Team Tournament final and heavyweight Ryan Tomei provided it.

The match was tied and Penn-Trafford (15-0) hoped to stop Canon-McMillan’s momentum when Tomei, who is headed to Pitt, pinned Canon-McMillan heavyweight A.J. Williams in 18 seconds.

Tomei’s pin and a major decision victory by Shane Young at 103 pounds helped Penn-Trafford hold on for a thrilling 28-27 victory at Gateway High School.

The win helped Penn-Trafford claim its first WPIAL team title and denied Canon-McMillan (14-6) from winning its sixth.

“Ryan knew we needed something big and he pumped up the team and our fans,” Penn-Trafford coach Vince Testa said. “Ryan has won a lot of things, but that was probably, to him, the most exciting win he’s had.”

Canon-McMillan had rallied back from an 18-9 deficit to tie the score at 18-18 on a win by Ron Totterdale at 215 pounds.

That’s when Tomei took the mat. He put Williams in a bear-hug and then picked him off the mat and onto his back for the fall. The large Penn-Trafford crowd erupted as Tomei gave them a pose.

“Everyone was telling me that I pretty much had to pin him to give us back the momentum,” Tomei said. “I was pretty intense. I was trying to get everyone pumped up.”

And he did. A pumped-up Young went out and easily dominated Ron Schram on his way to a 16-7 major-decision victory. Young’s win gave Penn-Trafford a 28-18 lead.

“All I tried to do was get a major-decision victory,” Young said. “I was confident I could do that.”

Canon-McMillan needed to win the final three bouts to defeat Penn-Trafford, but one of those wins needed to be a major decision or better. All the Big Macs got were decisions victories by Colin Johnston (112), Chris Pihiou (119) and Justin O’Brien (125).

Johnston almost got the points Canon-McMillan needed to win when he stacked Penn-Trafford’s Brock Livorio on his shoulders and nearly pinned him.

“We had him stacked and we didn’t get it,” Canon-McMillan coach Chris Mary said. “I was a good match. I’m proud of the wrestlers and their accomplishments. We’re excited about going to the state tournament.”

Penn-Trafford won some key bouts early. Jared Jones (130), Nick Hetherington (135) and Dan Matthews (160) won decisions, Bob Bryan (145) got a major decision and A.J. Brentzel (171) picked up a technical fall.

Matthews’ 3-1 win over Canon-McMillan’s Jordan Maier proved to be the difference. Testa moved Matthews away from Matt Ryan at 152 so he could gain a split, and the move worked.

“We had to get a split there,” Testa said. “The coaches and I worked things out before the match and every time it came out 7-7 in matches. We just got enough bonus points.”

Friday night, Testa sat stunned in the corner and couldn’t believe his eyes when his team defeated Connellsville.

“The only difference (Saturday) was I was jumping up and down,” said a happy Testa. “I was sick as a dog on Friday and I was fortunate the best medicine I could have had was a win against Connellsville.”

Penn-Trafford moves to the PIAA Team Tournament quarterfinals on Friday at Hershey. Canon-McMillan can earn a trip to Hershey if it defeats Pittsburgh City League champion Langley (11-6) on Tuesday night at Brashear High School.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.