ShareThis Page
PennDOT’s gross wages |

PennDOT’s gross wages

| Monday, September 6, 2004 12:00 a.m

Your article about PennDOT paying contract workers $104.33 an hour is a gross oversimplification and wrong by a factor of four (“Workers spot plenty of green on hillside,” Aug. 29).

The specialized workers needed for this project receive about $23 an hour in salary. Contrary to your account, the work on the Route 51 stabilization project in Aliquippa entails more than standing around and watching others work.

The so-called “spotters” must scale the rock face to complete the stabilization. The work is dangerous, but needed to ensure the safety of passing motorists.

The rate you cited includes the entire amount collected by the subcontractor to cover all its costs. The bulk of the rate — 78 percent — goes for such expenses as the employer’s overhead costs, insurance, fringe benefits and employees’ travel and housing costs. This subcontractor, one of only a handful available around the nation, is based in Canada.

We work with private industry to secure these kinds of services and in some cases such as this, the specialized work that is needed carries a hefty price tag. But the Trib’s account of this contract was misleading.

Karl Ishman

The writer is District Executive at PennDOT’s District 11 office.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.