ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania clinches nomination for Bush |

Pennsylvania clinches nomination for Bush

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, September 1, 2004 12:00 a.m

NEW YORK (AP) — President Bush officially secured the GOP presidential nomination on Tuesday with the votes of delegates from Pennsylvania, the same battleground state Republicans hope will deliver a win come November over Democratic challenger John Kerry.

The carefully choreographed roll call, which went by alphabetical order of states, started Monday and was to last until today. A number of states passed when their turns came up, allowing Pennsylvania to put Bush over the top.

“Pennsylvania has a proud tradition of leading America. … America, Pennsylvania is a George W. Bush state. Pennsylvania is proud to cast its 75 votes for President George W. Bush,” delegate Renee Amoore, of suburban Philadelphia, said in pushing the president past the 1,255 needed to capture a nomination never in doubt.

Delegates cheered and waved red, white and blue placards reading “4 More Years.”

Polls show Bush and Kerry neck-and-neck in Pennsylvania, which Democrat Al Gore won in 2000 by 4 percentage points. The president has visited the state 33 times since taking office in 2001, more than any other state, including a stopover Tuesday night in Gettysburg.

Bush is scheduled to make another trip through the Keystone State later this week after the convention.

Democrats during the roll call at their convention in Boston in July maneuvered to allow another battleground state, Ohio, to clinch the nomination for Kerry.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.