Pennsylvania Rep. Mike Doyle at vanguard of protest in Congress |

Pennsylvania Rep. Mike Doyle at vanguard of protest in Congress

Democrat members of Congress, including Reps. Peter DeFazio of Oregon (left), Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, and John Lewis of Georgia, participate in a protest seeking a a vote on gun control measures, Wednesday, June 22, 2016, on the floor of the House on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills, was one of the first to sit down on the House chamber floor Wednesday.

“We are going to shut this place down until (House Speaker Paul Ryan) allows a vote,” Doyle said in a phone interview from his position on the blue carpet.

The 30-year member of the Pennsylvania delegation and his colleagues want a vote on a proposal to ban people on the terror watch list from purchasing guns. Such a measure might have halted the Orlando shooting, he said.

The shooter had been on the watch list but was removed after the FBI ended its investigation in 2014.

“All Ryan did for (the Orlando victims) was a moment of silence and then he forgot them,” Doyle said. “He forgot the victims of Sandy Hook too. All those children.”

Sen. Bob Casey, a Scranton Democrat who has made a dramatic change in his stance on gun control, stopped by the chamber as a sign of solidarity, as did many other Democratic senators.

Salena Zito is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.