ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania Senate leader pledges openness in redistricting |

Pennsylvania Senate leader pledges openness in redistricting

Brad Bumsted
| Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:00 a.m

HARRISBURG — The ink had barely dried today on reform groups’ ideas for handling legislative redistricting when a top Senate Republican leader announced that some of the proposals advocating for openness and public input already are under way.

Common Cause, the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania, and Democracy Rising PA called for “transparency and public participation” in the Legislature’s redrawing of state and congressional district boundaries. Their long-range goal is some type of independent commission to take the decision making out of lawmakers’ hands. But because the process is gearing up, the groups highlighted things they believe can be changed now in the once-a-decade drawing of district maps based on population changes.

“The biggest political power play of the decade is about to get under way in Pennsylvania — and it is, perhaps, the most self-serving and least transparent process of state government,” said Barry Kauffman, executive direcor of Common Cause of Pennsylvania.

“Republicans favor plans good for Republicans and Democrats favor plans good for Democrats,” said Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi, R-Delaware County. But it must be done within a “constitutional framework” and in accordance with federal Voting Rights Act criteria, he said.

Pileggi said in an interview after the reform groups’ news conference that he is proposing a website that will include voter data, past district maps, meetings on redistricting, and proposed maps when time allows. The League of Women Voters cited the need for Internet posting of hearings, meeting transcripts, and proposed and revised plans.

“We had certainly planned to take advantage of technology that didn’t exist 10 years ago, for a website with data,” Pileggi said.

The league and Common Cause also called for a series of public hearings on redistricting. Olivia Thorne, league president, said such hearings should take place before and after a preliminary plan is proposed.

“It’s certainly my intent to have multiple public hearings,” Pileggi said.

The legislative plan must be adopted by a five-member commission made up of the four floor leaders of the House and Senate plus a fifth member they will choose or, if they cannot reach agreement, the state Supreme Court will choose, said Erik Arneson, Pileggi’s director of communication and policy.

The congressional plan is like any bill that needs approval by both chambers and is signed by the governor.

Republicans control both chambers and the governor’s mansion for the first time in nearly a decade.

Pileggi will take his proposal for a website to the other four members of the commission.

Pileggi questioned how independent any appointed commission can be and added, “It is inherently a political process and no less authority than the (U.S.) Supreme Court has said that.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.