ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania Senate panel approves new congressional map |

Pennsylvania Senate panel approves new congressional map

| Wednesday, December 14, 2011 12:00 a.m

HARRISBURG — A congressional redistricting bill that merges two Western Pennsylvania districts narrowly won approval today from a Senate committee, setting up a full vote in the upper chamber later this afternoon or this evening.

The state House then would vote on it next week.

The proposal, first unveiled yesterday afternoon, combines much of the 4th District held by Rep. Jason Altmire of McCandless and the 12th District of Rep. Mark Critz of Johnstown, both Democrats.

Common Cause of Pennsylvania issued a statement this afternoon blasting the plan as “breathtakingly brazen in its defiance of the interests of Pennsylvania’s voters.” The group’s lobbyist Barry Kauffman said the plan “is a clear-cut case of politicians picking their voters in order to prevent voters from having a meaningful opportunity to pick their elected officials.” Pennsylvania lost one congressional district, going from 19 to 18, because of population shifts from 2000 to 2010. Pennsylvania grew at a lower rate than other states and the Western part of the state generally lost population.

The Senate State Government Committee approved the bill 6-5 on the “proxy” vote in the affirmative by Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson County. Scarnati wasn’t there but committee chairman Charles McIlheny, R-Bucks County, cast his vote for him, which is allowed under Senate rules.

The vote was along party lines except for Sen. Mike Folmer, R-Lebanon County, who said there are constitutional problems with the bill and that he believes it was drawn to dilute the Democrats’ approximate 1 million voter registration edge in the state. It’s a prime exhibit on the need for redistricting reform, he said.

“All you have to do is look at it (the map,)” Folmer said.

The 7th congressional district in Southeast Pennsylvania looks like “a three-headed dog,” said Sen. Andrew Dinniman, D-Chester County.

If lawmakers took their oaths of office seriously, to follow the Constitution, this map would never have been produced, Folmer said.

Sen. Jake Corman, R-Centre County, who voted for it, said the map stretches districts so far that Franklin County in Southcentral Pennsylvania is in a district with Greene County voters in the Southwest corner of the state.

Critics also said there was not significant time for public review.

McIlheny defended the process as transparent. House State Government Committee Chairman Daryl Metcalfe, R-Cranberry, yesterday pointed to public hearings that had been held across the state.

“That is a fiction,” said Bill Patton, a spokesman for House Democrats, who attended the Senate hearing. “The public hearings were a half a year before the plan was

Common Cause noted that the Legislature has had the census data, on which the redistricting plan is based, since the beginning of April, but did not release its proposed plan until Tuesday.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.