ShareThis Page
17 Pennsylvania shops cited for selling e-cigs to minors |

17 Pennsylvania shops cited for selling e-cigs to minors


The federal Food and Drug Administration caught 17 Pennsylvania stores selling e-cigarettes and other vaping products to minors as part of a nationwide undercover crackdown.

Only one Southwestern Pennsylvania store was caught in the sweep, the rest were in Eastern Pennsylvania.

The FDA fined a Sheetz on Route 51 in Belle Vernon for selling Vuse brands vaping products to an undercover minor in June.

The administration issued warning letters and fines to more than 1,300 stores nationwide. It’s been cracking down on e-cigarette sellers and manufacturers.

In a speech Wednesday, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said youth use of electronic cigarettes has reached “epidemic proportions.”

According to FDA, the undercover “blitz” was conducted over the summer. The vast majority of e-cigarettes sold to minors — 97 percent — came from five major manufacturers: Vase, Blu, Juul, MarkTen XL and Logic.

The FDA this week sent warning letters to these five manufacturers. These companies have 60 days to come up with plans to curtaiil underage use of their products.

If they fail, the FDA may take action of its own, possibly by banning the fruit and candy e-cigarette flavors that are seen as a a major draw to minors.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter @Soolseem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.