Archive

ShareThis Page
7 hurt in buggy, SUV crash in Pennsylvania Dutch country | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

7 hurt in buggy, SUV crash in Pennsylvania Dutch country

The Associated Press
| Friday, November 28, 2014 9:09 a.m

KIRKWOOD — A sport utility vehicle slammed into a horse-drawn buggy that missed a stop sign in Pennsylvania Dutch country, injuring seven people, including a 3-month-old, police said.

All six people in the buggy — two adults and four children — were ejected in the Thursday night accident. The baby was airlifted to a hospital.

Witnesses said they found parts of the buggy more than 50 yards from the intersection in Colerain Township, about 20 miles southeast of Lancaster, where it collided with a Subaru Outback.

Becky Hemric, who lives nearby, said the buggy looked “all smashed up.”

“There were bodies everywhere,” neighbor Mark Harmon said. “People in the street, people tending to the baby. I just got them some blankets and tried to keep them from getting hit by other cars.”

The driver of the buggy, 38-year-old Daniel Esh, and one of the children suffered severe injuries and were listed in stable condition, police said. Another child was listed in critical condition. Two boys suffered minor injuries. A woman in the buggy was unhurt.

Two people in the car — driver Beverly Paul,71, of Annapolis and her passenger, a 92-year-old Lancaster woman — suffered minor injuries.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.