ShareThis Page
Beleaguered Pennsylvania AG Kathleen Kane seeks 5% budget increase for agency |

Beleaguered Pennsylvania AG Kathleen Kane seeks 5% budget increase for agency

HARRISBURG — Embattled Attorney General Kathleen Kane, facing trial on criminal charges in August, on Thursday asked a Senate panel for a 5 percent budget increase for her agency.

Kane arrived and departed under heavy security and refused to answer reporters’ questions after the hearing, which lasted less than an hour.

None of the senators from either political party asked Kane, a Democrat, how she’ll pay up to $2 million to a Washington law firm to investigate porn exchanged on state government email servers.

Kane on Dec. 1 named Douglas Gansler as a special deputy to lead the effort that will examine potential conflicts among prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges who exchanged emails.

Gansler’s law firm has a contract with the Office of Attorney General, but Gansler does not independently have a contract with the office, Kane’s spokesman said. Kane selectively released offensive emails starting in the fall of 2014.

She declined to answer questions from reporters about suspended Supreme Court Justice Michael Eakin following a judicial court’s refusal at a hearing in Pittsburgh to consider any deal regarding Eakin’s lewd emails.

Kane last fall reported Eakin’s emails to the state judicial board. She said she didn’t know enough about what happened in Pittsburgh while her office’s budget hearing was ongoing.

Kane announced last week she would not seek re-election to a second term. She is the first woman to hold the elected office of attorney general.

Kane, 49, of Scranton faces felony perjury charges, obstruction of justice and official oppression for allegedly lying and orchestrating a cover-up of her grand jury leak to a Philadelphia newspaper to embarrass a critic, prosecutors claim. Kane says she’s innocent and that she was set up by an “old boys network” for exposing porn exchanges on state computers. Kane’s law license was suspended by the Supreme Court in October. An effort to remove her from office failed in the state Senate. The House is conducting an impeachment investigation.

The Legislature is controlled by Republicans.

Most of the budget increase Kane requested was for mandatory retirement costs for employees, she said. Her office employs 759 people. She also requested money for equipment and additional agents for the drug and Internet predators units.

Brad Bumsted is the Tribune-Review’s state Capitol reporter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.