ShareThis Page
Cleanup begins at Ellwood City recycling plant that burned |

Cleanup begins at Ellwood City recycling plant that burned

| Monday, November 9, 2015 4:36 p.m.

Cleanup began at an Ellwood City hazardous waste recycling plan that burned Sunday and Monday, even as firefighters battled hotspots into Monday afternoon.

Inmetco officials brought in outside contractors to handle the job, according to Ellwood City fire Chief Rick Myers.

“They’re making pretty good headway,” Myers said. He said the portion of the building where the fire started collapsed on itself and onto the burning product.

“It’s a slow, tedious jaunt to get into there,” he said.

Company officials did not return a call for comment.

Myers said the Department of Environmental Protections was continuing to monitor the air quality around the plant, but smoke didn’t appear to pose a danger.

“It’ll smell nasty, but they’re telling us it’s not hazardous,” he said.

The call for the fire came in just before 9 a.m. Sunday, officials said. The fire was contained to the building of origin by about 10:40 a.m.

Inmetco, a subsidiary of Horsehead Holdings Corp., specializes in recycling metals from batteries and hazardous waste.

In March, Inmetco announced a $10 million expansion of the Ellwood City plant to increase capacity by 15 percent and meet increased demand for its steel waste and battery recycling services.

The project was expected to be completed in 2016, according to a news release on the company’s website.

Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at 412-380-8519 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.