Cops: Penn State employee videotaped high school student in bathroom |

Cops: Penn State employee videotaped high school student in bathroom


A Penn State employee has been charged after allegedly videotaping a high school student attending the State College Area School District prom at the Bryce Jordan Center, according to SCASD and police.

A guest of a SCASD student, who attends school at an undisclosed district, reported that a man recorded him in a men’s restroom, which prompted a joint investigation by State College and Penn State police. The incident occurred May 12, but it wasn’t the first time, according to a criminal complaint that said this followed a pattern for more than one year at the facility.

Charles W. Chamberlin Jr. has been charged with 76 counts of misdemeanor invasion of privacy by photographing or viewing intimate parts of another person. Police said in the criminal complaint that Chamberlain “produced 37 videos of males urinating in one particular Bryce Jordan Center men’s bathroom.”

“Despite our diligent efforts to protect students at this event, which included a State College police officer, our security staff and multiple chaperones, we’re saddened that something this troubling has been reported,” SCASD Superintendent Bob O’Donnell said. “Because the safety of students is paramount, we continue to work with local law enforcement agencies to strengthen security at future district events. As always, we want to make sure we are doing everything we can to ensure the well-being of students in our care.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.