ShareThis Page
Corbett promises to limit health care law’s ‘negative impact on Pennsylvanians’ |

Corbett promises to limit health care law’s ‘negative impact on Pennsylvanians’

HARRISBURG — Republican Gov. Tom Corbett expressed his disappointment in the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Thursday upholding the federal health care law but pledged to “limit the law’s negative impact on Pennsylvanians.”

Corbett, who as attorney general challenged the law, read a statement and declined to answer questions, saying there had been little time to absorb the 193-page decision. He said he would comply with the ruling out of respect for “the law and the process of the law.”

“Despite the president’s repeated assertions that this was not a tax, the Supreme Court today ruled that it is in fact a tax,” Corbett said.

House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont, said the ruling “provides certainty going forward for patients, small businesses, doctors and the health care providers that are some of Pennsylvania’s largest employers.”

The chairman of a state House panel overseeing health care said the “silver lining” in the ruling is language that lets states opt out of costly Medicaid expansion without being punished. It also lets states opt out of abortion funding, said Rep. Matthew Baker, R-Tioga County, an abortion opponent.

“I personally don’t think the commonwealth of Pennsylvania can sustain that spending,” he said.

Baker said Pennsylvania should decline the Medicaid expansion because it would cost from $800 million to $1.2 billion in the next few years.

Rep. Joe Markosek, D-Monroeville, said the costs of expanding Medicaid will be offset under the law through prescription drug discounts, reduced costs for the Children’s Health Insurance Program and lower costs in the state’s low-cost prescription drug program for low-income seniors.

It is unclear whether an opt-out could be done by the Legislature or by executive order of the governor. Kevin Harley, Corbett’s spokesman, said the governor is still studying language on the Medicaid opt-out and how it could be done.

“Like the governor, we are reviewing the decision in great detail to determine our options going forward,” said Erik Arneson, spokesman for Senate Republicans. The ruling does not require immediate action by the Legislature, he said.

Planned Parenthood said the law will provide access to birth control and cancer screenings without co-payments, guarantee direct access to obstetrics/gynecology providers without referrals and end discriminatory practices against women.

“This decision will have a profound and concrete impact on millions of people’s lives, said Sari Stevens, executive director of Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates.

Brad Bumsted is state Capitol reporter for the Tribune-Review. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 and [email protected]. Michael Macagnone is an intern for the Pennsylvania Legislative Correspondents Association. He can be reached at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.