Corbett signs ethane cracker tax bill |

Corbett signs ethane cracker tax bill

Shell Chemicals announced this spring that the Horsehead Plant shown here in Potter and Center Township, Beaver County was chosen as a potential location for a cracker plant. File photo

HARRISBURG – Gov. Tom Corbett signed legislation late Saturday establishing an unlimited tax credit to encourage petrochemical companies to move to Pennsylvania in hopes that it will create a “new industrial revolution” in the state.

Corbett, who asked the Legislature for the measure, is negotiating with Royal Dutch Shell plc to build a plant in Beaver County on the Center-Potter line near the Beaver Valley Expressway.

The House approved the bill, part of a broader tax code legislation, by a 140-56 margin Saturday night. It won Senate approval Friday night.

“My goal, our goal, is to transform Pennsylvania, so we’re not only a supplier of natural gas, but also a processor and manufacturer,” Corbett said.

“This credit will work to keep the industry and our resources here in Pennsylvania, grow jobs, and grow our economy.

“Simply put: We will usher in a new industrial revolution in Pennsylvania,” the governor said.

“While creating jobs, this new industry will help us recover and clean up former brownfields as new facilities are built.”

Rep. Jim Christiana, who sponsored a tax credit bill, called it a “historic opportunity” to bring a thriving industry to Pennsylvania.

It’s an industry that would utilize natural gas reserves in the Marcellus shale formation. The so-called ethane cracker would produce ethylene, used in the manufacture of various plastics.

Christiana, R-Beaver County, said the proposed Shell facility would be the first cracker plant built nationwide in 10 years, and would be the first in the Appalachian region.

“There’s an opportunity here to have several crackers,” Christiana said. “There’s enough ethane here to power two or three crackers.”

There’s been debate over the job predictions, but the Corbett administration stands by the estimate of 10,000 construction jobs: several hundred at the plant, and up to 10,000 more in spinoff industries.

Corbett had proposed a $66 million a year tax credit. That number was removed in the Senate.

“There is no minimum or maximum,” Christiana said.

“There’s no cap,” he said in response to an interrogation by Rep. Greg Vitali, D-Delaware County.

Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Forest Hills, who supported it, called it a “game changer” for Western Pennsylvania’s economy.

The tax credit was inserted into the 2012-13 state tax code bill that accompanied the budget even though the tax credit won’t be available until 2017.

The legislation requires a minimum $1 million plant investment and creation of 2,500 jobs to qualify for the tax credit.

There’s no guarantee that the jobs will go to Pennsylvanians, said Rep. Mike Sturla, D-Lancaster. “One could live in Ohio or West Virginia and drive to Pennsylvania every day,” Sturla said.

Rep. Eddie Day Pashinski, D-Luzerne County, said an estimated $1.6 billion is going to a multi-national corporation that bought property already in a tax-free zone. Shell can “sell the tax credits without the guarantee of hiring Pennsylvanians,” Pashinski said.

“There’s going to be Pennsylvania jobs,” said House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods.

Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Montgomery County, said there was little time to review the complex tax bill, which also included an expansion of tax credits for student scholarships to private schools.

The tax credit language wasn’t publicly available until Friday afternoon, hours before the Senate voted on it Friday night.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.