ShareThis Page
Crowd funding sought for horror card game |

Crowd funding sought for horror card game

Hannah Sawyer
| Saturday, September 14, 2013 5:06 p.m

YORK — To R. Todd Broadwater, a visit to his grandmother’s house outside of Elicott City, Md., when he was a child was like a visit to the Wild West, he said.

There was no indoor plumbing, only outhouses, he said, and his grandmother told the best ghost stories.

Broadwater, who now lives in Hopewell Township, York County, said local folklore and family tales captured his attention from an early age and set him on a career path that included special effects, tabletop game design, toy design and eventually, a job in the video game industry.

This summer, he merged his experience and his interest in the macabre in what he said was a “simple idea” for a horror card game he called Zero Hour.

Players choose five cards, each with a vintage photo of a child on it, from the deck. Each turn, children face dangers — some less threatening like abstract shapes or sounds, and others more menacing, like deadly creatures — and risk losing their sanity. At the end of the game, scores are tallied based on the number and a point value assigned to a player’s living children.

Broadwater designed the game and the cards in about 24 hours, but he needed funding to get the project into production, he said. So he turned to Kickstarter, an online funding platform.

Started in 2009, Kickstarter is a for-profit company where creators post projects in categories ranging from fashion to food to technology.

Then, creators set a funding goal and deadline. If people like a project, they pledge money through the website. Projects are all or nothing — if one doesn’t reach its funding goal, the creator does not receive any money.

Hannah Sawyer is a staff writer for the (York) Daily Record/Sunday News

Categories: Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.