DEP ‘keeps you in dark’ about spills, officials say |

DEP ‘keeps you in dark’ about spills, officials say

DEP officials 'don't tell us any more than they have to. I think we ... have a right to know,' said Ed Barale, a supervisor in Amwell. Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Philip G. Pavely
Center Township (Greene County) Supervisors Chairman Edward 'Butch' Deter shows an are that was the site of a diesel fuel spill in December that crept from the top of the mountain into Patterson Run. The DEP was notified of the incident, but local officials and emergency response units were not alerted of a spill or how many gallons contaminated the ground and creek. Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review

Gas drilling-related companies spilled oils, gases or chemicals about 134 times onto land and into water across Pennsylvania since Jan. 1, 2011, but the state rarely, if ever, notified the public.

By law, it doesn’t have to.

Officials from a dozen Western Pennsylvania townships affected by the spills want such notification.

State Department of Environmental Protection records obtained by the Tribune-Review show at least 27 spills from shale drilling in 19 townships in the agency’s 10-county southwestern region during that time. Most officials the Trib contacted said they knew nothing about the incidents.

DEP officials “don’t tell us any more than they have to. I think we … have a right to know,” said Ed Barale, a supervisor in Amwell.

DEP records show Texas-based Range Resources Corp. was responsible for a stream discharge, a drilling fluid leak and an overturned tanker spilling brine in Amwell — all of which township officials learned about weeks later from workers, Barale said. “DEP keeps you in the dark, anyhow. So I don’t have much faith in them,” he said.

The state agency is revising its policy for spill responses, but during 60 days of public comment this spring no municipal officials complained about its communication practices, said Kevin Sunday, DEP spokesman in Harrisburg.

The state’s records can be misinterpreted, he said. What DEP classified as a “stream discharge” in Amwell instead was 200 barrels of brine water in a roadside channel that leads to a lined pond the company created to hold spills, Sunday said.

“It’s just the way they have to enter these things in, which is very, very confusing,” said Matt Pitzarella, Range’s spokesman. “Unfortunately, you have mechanical errors, but they’re engineered so that when these things happen, we’re able to excavate it, and there’s no impact to the environment, including the one with the stream.”

Range agreed in April to pay $18,025 for some violations in Amwell and in Hopewell, Washington County, but a resolution to this spill is pending, Pitzarella said.

Three Amwell families are suing the company and DEP over environmental problems they claim stem from Range’s operations.

State withholds some information

DEP issued citations for at least 52 of 134 drilling-related spills, and said 50 of them involved polluted water. Drillers failed to properly report nearly a third of pollution incidents as required, according to the list of violations.

DEP withheld 92 pages of documents about numerous incidents, saying the state’s open records law allows it to keep investigative records and informants’ names confidential, so the total number of incidents could be higher. The records withheld include “emergency response/notification reports, a chronology of an investigation and an investigative report as to a wide assortment of events in and around various well sites.”

According to DEP records, incidents unreported to the public include:

A drilling wastewater truck overturned on June 28, 2011, on its way to a Chevron well, spilling an unknown amount of diesel fuel into an unnamed tributary of Lilly Run in Redstone, Fayette County. Chevron agreed to pay a $6,000 fine that also covered another diesel spill and sediment pollution at two other Fayette County wells.

Workers for Williams Companies Inc. illegally dumped sediment and allowed a drilling fluid pit to overflow at separate well sites in Derry in 2011. Williams agreed to pay a $15,500 fine.

A plastic tank spilled 130 gallons of methanol on the ground at an Exco Resources Inc. well in Cowanshannock, Armstrong County, on March 30, 2011. Workers recovered 70 percent of the liquid before it saturated the soil. The file for the well contained no record of any related fine, though the company agreed in February to pay $15,000 for drilling deeper than the Marcellus shale there without a permit.

The department is required to notify municipal officials about some spills that take more than 90 days to clean, and it must notify water users of any spills that might affect their supply, Sunday said. He said the department notifies local officials during emergencies when violations risk public health or safety though the law does not require that.

Neighbors require notification

Companies must immediately report to DEP any spills that threaten to pollute state waterways — and ultimately must report all spills, Sunday said.

Any brine spill of more than 5 gallons must be reported within two hours of detection, he said, but noted, “This is categorically a different kind of spill, in need of different response measures than a larger-scale accident, where we would need to — and do — coordinate with local officials.”

Municipal leaders in Center in Greene County met with department officials after Downtown-based EQT Corp. spilled 480 gallons of diesel fuel into Patterson Run in December, said Edward “Butch” Deter, chairman of the township’s board of supervisors and president of Center Township Volunteer Fire Department, Company 91. Local leaders didn’t know about the spill until the Tribune-Review notified them in March.

Center officials want automatic notification of any event but haven’t figured out how to mandate that, Deter said. Department officials told them they wouldn’t want to know about every small spill, he said. It isn’t clear that DEP officials should be making that judgement if a 480-gallon spill went unreported to the public, he said.

“Any time a company has to notify DEP, they should have to notify a municipal official,” Deter said. “Let us know about everything, and we’ll decide how we respond to it.”

In West Virginia, drillers must identify anyone living within a mile of their wells and notify them of any accidents or spills, said Kathy Cosco, spokeswoman for the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. They notify an emergency contact at the county level for emergencies, which aren’t specifically defined, Cosco said.

Ohio has no such requirement, said Linda Oros, spokeswoman at the state’s Environmental Protection agency.

“If there’s some sort of public impact where there’s going to be sheltering action, or evacuation that’s required, then, of course, we would notify the public,” Oros said.

Pennsylvania lawmakers have mandated that drillers register geographic coordinates with state and county emergency agencies.

An idea with bipartisan support in the House would create a real-time network monitoring system to alert municipal emergency managers – and other county and state officials – of any well-site problems, said state Reps. Randy Vulakovich, R-Shaler, and Bud George, D-Clearfield County.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.