Election Security Commission recommends immediate action on vulnerable voting machines |

Election Security Commission recommends immediate action on vulnerable voting machines


Saying Pennsylvania elections are at risk, the bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission on Pennsylvania’s Election Security on Tuesday issued a series of recommendations months in advance of the release of its full report.

The commission, convened by former U.S. Attorney David Hickton, founding director of the University of Pittsburgh’s Institute for Cyber Law, Policy, and Security , and Grove City College President Paul McNulty, said it is critical that counties act to replace voting machines that lack paper back-ups in time for the 2019 election.

Although there is no publicly available evidence the state’s voting machines were hacked in the 2016 general election, Hickton said many systems are not secure.

“The vast majority of Pennsylvania’s voting machines are vulnerable to electronic manipulation and have no paper back-ups to ensure the integrity of elections. Giving voters in Pennsylvania and across the country access to trustworthy equipment is a civic duty of the highest priority,” said Hickton.

McNulty, a former U.S. deputy attorney general in the Bush administration agreed.

“This is not a partisan issue,” said McNulty. “We must not leave our elections — and therefore our democracy — at risk of cyber attack. There is no question that Pennsylvania’s outdated voting machines must be addressed.”

Officials in Southwestern Pennsylvania began exploring alternative voting systems earlier this year when Gov. Tom Wolf called on counties to replace systems without paper back-ups in time for the 2020 election. But cost has been an issue.

The Commission on Election Security estimated that about 80 percent of voting machines statewide lack paper back-ups.

Officials in Westmoreland County, who previewed several alternative voting systems earlier this year, estimated it will cost $7 million to buy new voting machines that meet the new criteria.

Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald estimated the cost there could run as high as $25 million, given the number of machines that would be necessary.

The Pennsylvania Association of County Commissioners has estimated that costs statewide could be as much as $125 million.

The Commission on Election Security recommended the state and federal governments should help underwrite the bill and that officials should follow best practices to minimize balloting vulnerability in the future.

The Commission is expected to release a complete report including recommendations on securing registration systems in early 2019.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, [email protected] or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.