ShareThis Page
Erie courthouse coke search legal, judge says |

Erie courthouse coke search legal, judge says

| Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:39 p.m

ERIE — An Erie County sheriff’s deputy’s power to search courthouse visitors for weapons extends to the inside of an aspirin bottle, especially in an age where weapons can be contained in a grain of ricin.

That was the ruling last week from Erie County Judge William R. Cunningham, who was asked to rule on whether the seizure of crack cocaine from an Erie County Courthouse visitor’s Anacin bottle was legal.

Cunningham, siding with arguments made by Assistant District Attorney Erin Connelly, upheld a deputy’s search of defendant William Gillespie’s belongings on March 27.

The deputy, Cunningham said, “was acting within the administrative authority given him to determine whether the defendant’s bottle contained a weapon or any other substance capable of harming a human.”

Cunningham noted that the courthouse was once shut down for three days following threats of mass destruction made with a powdery substance.

With the ruling, the prosecution of crack cocaine possession charges against Gillespie, 30, of the 800 block of Walnut Street will again move forward in Erie County Court.

Categories: Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.