Ex-AG Kathleen Kane must report to jail by Thursday |

Ex-AG Kathleen Kane must report to jail by Thursday


HARRISBURG – Former state Attorney General Kathleen Kane must report to jail by Thursday morning to begin serving her sentence for convictions on perjury and other charges that she abused the power of her office in an attempt to smear a perceived political enemy.

Montgomery County Judge Wendy Demchick-Alloy on Tuesday revoked Kane’s bail and ordered her to report to the Montgomery County Correctional Facility by 9 a.m. Thursday to begin serving her 10-to-23 month sentence.

Kane, 52, who was convicted and sentenced in 2016, had remained free on bail while she pursued her state appeals.

But on Monday, the state Supreme Court refused to consider Kane’s appeal of her conviction, exhausting her legal options to delay serving her sentence.

Kane, the first woman and first Democrat elected as the state’s top law enforcement officer, had asked the high court to hear her case after Superior Court earlier this year affirmed her conviction for perjury and leaking grand jury information. Kane had argued, among other things, that a special prosecutor who first built the case against her had lacked legal authority.

Kane’s lawyer, Joshua Lock, did not return multiple calls seeking comment.

A Montgomery County jury found Kane guilty of orchestrating an illegal news leak to damage a political enemy: Frank Fina, a onetime top prosecutor in the state Attorney General’s office.

Prosecutors had argued that Kane blamed Fina for a March 2014 story in The Inquirer and Daily News that revealed that she had secretly shut down a sting investigation that had captured Democratic elected officials from Philadelphia on tape accepting envelopes stuffed with cash, money order or gifts.

To exact revenge, Kane arranged a leak of grand jury information related to a separate investigation that she believed showed Fina had failed to aggressively pursue corruption allegations.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.