Archive

ShareThis Page
Ex-House Democratic leader DeWeese seeks new trial | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Ex-House Democratic leader DeWeese seeks new trial

The Associated Press
| Friday, November 28, 2014 1:39 p.m.

HARRISBURG — A former Pennsylvania House Democratic leader who served a sentence for corruption is seeking a new trial now that he’s out of state prison.

Former state Rep. Bill DeWeese made the filing this week in Dauphin County Court claiming he should have been allowed to present more defense witnesses during his trial.

The filing contends that DeWeese’s trial attorney didn’t represent him effectively.

The 64-year-old Greene County Democrat was convicted in 2012 and released from state prison on March 30.

A Dauphin County jury convicted DeWeese of conspiracy, conflict of interest and theft for using his position to persuade or force employees to illegally perform campaign work and misusing public resources for political purposes.

He’s on parole until his sentence ends in 2017.

DeWeese represented his Southwestern Pennsylvania district for 35 years, spending much of his tenure in Democratic leadership, including a two-year stint as House speaker.

DeWeese was the only sitting legislator to stand trial among the 25 Democrats and Republicans connected to the House of Representatives who were arrested in a state corruption probe.

Most of the defendants were convicted.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.