ShareThis Page
Former Greene County coal miner acquitted of reckless endangerment |

Former Greene County coal miner acquitted of reckless endangerment

| Friday, May 30, 2014 12:01 a.m

A former Greene County coal miner who lost his job and suffered a stroke after accusations that he smoked a cigarette in a mine was acquitted at trial.

Jurors on Wednesday found Donald D. Adams, 52, of Spraggs not guilty of unlawful conduct and reckless endangerment after a two-day trial in Waynesburg. A third charge of risking a catastrophe was dropped before the trial.

The state attorney general’s office filed the charges in February when other miners who smelled smoke at the Emerald Mine, a bituminous mine in Franklin Township, discovered a burned cigarette and a water bottle near the mine’s air-lock doors, prosecutors said.

As the miners exited, they found Adams seated nearby. Adams was immediately suspended, then fired the following day, according to his attorney, Benjamin Goodwin of Carmichaels and Uniontown.

Goodwin said Adams, who maintained his innocence and rejected plea bargains in favor of trial, was stripped of his bituminous coal mining certifications.

He suffered a stroke eight days after he was fired and likely will never be able to return to working in the mines, Goodwin said.

“He lost everything, based on those allegations,” Goodwin said. “But throughout this, he would not take any deal. He stood by his guns.”

Had Adams been convicted of the unlawful conduct charge, a felony, he faced 10 to 20 years in prison, Goodwin said.

Goodwin acknowledged that Adams initially told his supervisors the cigarette was his, but that he had not smoked it in the mine. That admission was false, Goodwin said.

“There was some confusion over his version of the events, when he was hauled into a conference room, where he didn’t know what he was being accused of, and he was being hollered at by his mine foreman,” Goodwin said.

Goodwin said prosecutors failed to perform DNA tests on the cigarette butt or the water bottle, raising reasonable doubt with jurors. In addition, witnesses reported seeing two unidentified men earlier in the shift in the area where the smoke and cigarette were discovered.

“There were a lot of other inconsistencies among the miners, so there was reasonable doubt,” Goodwin said.

When the smoke was discovered, 117 other miners were working in the mine, and methane gas was present, prosecutors said.

Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or

Categories: Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.