Former Harrisburg bishop denies misconduct allegation |

Former Harrisburg bishop denies misconduct allegation

The Associated Press
The Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend said former Harrisburg bishop Kevin Rhoades “adamantly denies” the accusation and that he “did nothing wrong.” (AP)

HARRISBURG — A former Pennsylvania Roman Catholic bishop who now serves in Indiana has denied an allegation of misconduct.

The Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend told in a statement Thursday that former Harrisburg bishop Kevin Rhoades “adamantly denies” the accusation and that he “did nothing wrong.”

Dauphin County District Attorney Fran Chardo received the report last month. Rhoades hasn’t been charged.

According to Chardo, the alleged male victim was around 18-years-old when the incident happened. Chardo says the individual died in 1996.

“The report alleged that they perceived the relationship as odd,” Chardo said. “But they did not witness any inappropriate conduct,” he added.

The allegation would land within the statute of limitations.

“We would stress that this is an allegation,” said Mike Barley, a spokesman for the Harrisburg Diocese. “We will have no further comment until the investigation of the Office of the District Attorney is concluded,” added Barley.

Rhoades began with the Harrisburg Diocese in 1983 at St. Patrick’s Catholic Church in York. He went on to serve as bishop from 2004 to 2009. Rhoades left Harrisburg and was named bishop of the Fort Wayne-South Bend Diocese in Jan. 2010.

David Clogesst, former director of the Survivors Network for those Abused by Priests, believes Rhoades should step down while the investigation is underway.

“I urge Catholic officials in Indiana and Pennsylvania to aggressively reach out to others who may have seen, suspected or suffered crimes, misdeeds or cover ups, by Rhoades or other clerics,” Clohessy said.

The accusation follows a landmark Pennsylvania grand jury report that claimed over 1,000 children in six Catholic dioceses have been abused since the 1940s.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.