Archive

ShareThis Page
Former Pennsylvania AG Kane loses bid to delay jail sentence | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Former Pennsylvania AG Kane loses bid to delay jail sentence

The Associated Press
48795148795119da94be6048465892e476373fbf9932
FILE - In this Monday, Oct. 24, 2016, file photo, former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane arrives at Montgomery County courthouse for her sentencing hearing in Norristown, Pa. The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court on Monday, Nov. 26, 2018, announced it will not review Kane’s conviction for leaking grand jury information and lying about it, and the Montgomery County district attorney’s office said it plans to ask a judge the following morning to revoke her bail. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)
48931348931319da94be6048465892e476373fbf9932
FILE - In this Monday, Oct. 24, 2016, file photo, former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane arrives at Montgomery County courthouse for her sentencing hearing in Norristown, Pa. The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court on Monday, Nov. 26, 2018, announced it will not review Kane's conviction for leaking grand jury information and lying about it, and the Montgomery County district attorney's office said it plans to ask a judge the following morning to revoke her bail. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

Former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on Wednesday lost an eleventh-hour request to be given more time before she must report to jail and begin serving a 10- to 23-month perjury and obstruction sentence.

A county judge moved quickly, turning down Kane’s motion about an hour after it was filed. Kane had sought a hearing or conference, saying a “brief extension” would help her nail down arrangements for her high-school age sons.

The judge’s denial repeated her direction issued a day earlier, telling Kane to report by 9 a.m. Thursday to the Montgomery County Correctional Facility.

Kane’s lawyer, William Brennan, said he was aware of the judge’s order but offered no immediate reaction.

Kane was serving as the first woman and first Democrat to be elected attorney general in Pennsylvania history when she was convicted in 2016 of leaking grand jury material and lying about it. She resigned after being convicted.

She has remained free since then on $75,000 bail, pending appeals, but on Monday the state Supreme Court declined to take up her case. On Tuesday, Montgomery County Judge Wendy Demchick-Alloy granted prosecutors’ request to revoke her bail.

Kane, 52, argued in seeking the delay that she has primary custody of her 16- and 17-year-old sons. She said the additional time would allow her to “solidify” arrangements with her ex-husband and family. She lives in Scranton.

“Her ex-husband supports this motion and will provide information through proffer or testimony should the court deem necessary,” Brennan wrote in the motion directed to Demchick-Alloy.

In her Tuesday order, Demchick-Alloy said there was no longer any reason for Kane to remain free. Brennan had asked that that order be put on hold while the judge considered whether to grant Kane more time.

Brennan said in an interview earlier Wednesday that Kane did not know when “the other shoe was going to drop.”

He said Kane could ask the high court to reconsider its decision but that was not likely.

“This is a human problem more than a legal issue,” Brennan said, adding “she’s prepared to put this matter behind her and move on with her life.”

A spokeswoman for the Montgomery County district attorney’s office declined to comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.