Funeral set for Stroudsburg-area township worker shot at municipal building |

Funeral set for Stroudsburg-area township worker shot at municipal building

The Associated Press
David Green, 72, of Swiftwater, Pa., is led into the office of Magisterial District Judge Phillip Riley on Tuesday, Nov. 27, 2018, in Mountainhome, Pa. Green faces a homicide charge after police say he opened fire at the Paradise Township municipal building Tuesday morning, killing 65-year-old Michael Tripus. (Butch Comegys/The Times-Tribune via AP)

STROUDSBURG — Funeral services are set for a Pennsylvania township worker who was shot and killed this week by a man having issues getting permits.

Michael Tripus was shot Tuesday at the Paradise Township municipal building in the Pocono Mountains, about 100 miles north of Philadelphia.

Police have charged 72-year-old David Green with the killing. He’s said he’s sorry.

Funeral services are set for Monday at the William H. Clark Funeral Home in Stroudsburg.

His wife, Pamela Tripus, says in a Facebook posting her husband was looking forward to donating toys to The Salvation Army for Christmas, and was always focused on helping kids in need.

His family requests memorial remembrances be made to the organization’s toy drive in East Stroudsburg.

Green told police he was having problems with his new house, including mold.

A neighbor tells police Green was having difficulty obtaining permits.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.