Geologist: Site of idyllic 1833 painting of Lancaster found |

Geologist: Site of idyllic 1833 painting of Lancaster found

LANCASTER — In 1833, well-known early American painter Jacob Eichholtz finished an idyllic scene of an oxbow bend in Conestoga Creek with the many-steepled outline of Lancaster city in the distance.

It was a reminder of home for the artist’s eldest daughter, who had recently moved to Philadelphia.

Last week, East Petersburg resident Jay Parrish stood at the head of a ravine in a nook of woods just off the fairway of the fourth hole on the course of the Meadia Heights Golf Club.

The stone house that once stood on the bank of the Conestoga is now a flattened green.

Trees block a lot of the Lancaster skyline now. But the luminescent white steeple of Trinity Lutheran Church is just visible through a sycamore tree, just as it was in the autumn scene that Eichholtz painted.

“This is it,” says Parrish, former Pennsylvania state geologist, with an unmistakable air of satisfaction.

This is where the artist, known throughout much of the early republic for his portraits, stood with his easel 181 years ago, putting the finishing touches on his sweeping painting. He had waited until a killing frost had dropped the leaves and Eichholtz could get distant objects right.

How did Parrish know where the painter stood?

It wasn’t easy and Parrish had to play detective, piecing together clues taken from the modern marvels of radar topography and digital visualization, along with gumshoe sleuth methods of hoofing it to knolls and looking for himself.

Solving the artistic mystery began 11 years ago when Thomas R. Ryan, president and CEO of, was curating an exhibit of Eichholtz’s collected works at three locations in Lancaster.

Parrish, who was friends with Ryan’s wife, saw the 1833 painting and heard Ryan mention that no one knew where the artist had set up.

Parrish, who was working for the state Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey, ventured that he thought he could figure it out.

First, Parrish and Ryan deduced from the church spires, Furnace Hills in the background and bend in Conestoga Creek (now river) that the spot was somewhere south of the city.

Then, using radar imagery of topography, the two looked at 3D views on a computer and selected three possible sites.

Parrish drew lines directly north from each of the candidate sites to one of the church steeples in the painting. Digital visualization, confirmed by on-site visits, ruled out two of the sites because the views did not match that of the painting.

That led Parrish and Ryan to a knoll and ravine just south of a peninsula that now holds part of Greenwood Cemetery.

“It was an extraordinary moment,” says Ryan, who did his doctorate thesis on Eichholtz.

The river peninsula is still mostly farmed, just as it was in Eichholtz’s time.

Parrish does say the artist took some liberties with the Furnace Hills in the distance but notes that Eichholtz did not have the aid of binoculars at the time.

“I felt pretty good that I had found the exact spot where he was standing when he did it,” Parrish says.

So good, in fact, that three years later, he made a presentation to the Geological Society of America, using the Eichholtz connection as an example of the practical uses of digital visualization.

Ad Crable is a staff writer for

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.