Archive

GOP group runs with ad attacking candidate for Pa. attorney general despite errors | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

GOP group runs with ad attacking candidate for Pa. attorney general despite errors

The Associated Press

HARRISBURG — Democrats attacked a Republican group on Monday because it continued to air a TV commercial criticizing Kathleen Kane, the Democratic candidate for state attorney general, even after the group was confronted with evidence of serious mistakes in the ad.

Democrats tried to turn the attack ad by the Washington-based Republican State Leadership Committee against Kane’s Republican opponent, David Freed.

“David Freed’s inaction right now speaks volumes as to what kind of attorney general’s office he would run … if his campaign for Pennsylvania’s top law enforcement job doesn’t even care about the truth,” said Jim Burn, the Democratic Party’s state chairman.

Freed’s campaign manager, Tim Kelly, said there is no coordination between the candidate and the Republican State Leadership Committee, and he issued a statement that did not criticize the group.

“David Freed is running his campaign in the way he’s run the district attorney’s office for the past seven years, with honesty and integrity,” Kelly said. “It’s our sincere hope that our opponent, as well as any outside groups that are supporting our campaign or our opponent’s campaign, conduct themselves in an honest and ethical manner.” Freed is the district attorney of Cumberland County.

Kane, a former Lackawanna County prosecutor, is making her first bid for elective office, trying to become the first woman and the first Democrat to be elected as the state’s chief legal and law enforcement officer.

In the ad, the Republican State Leadership Committee claims that Kane mishandled two rape cases. But Kane’s former boss, Lackawanna County District Attorney Andrew Jarbola, a Republican, said on Monday that Kane had nothing to do with either case. Court clerks put her name on the case dockets because she was the prosecutor on duty at central court that day, Jarbola said.

The Republican State Leadership Committee could have found the name of the prosecutor who handled the cases by reading through the case files, he said.

“They don’t know how the system operates, and this is coming from a Republican DA,” Jarbola said.

The Republican State Leadership Committee is devoted to electing party members to state-level public offices. A spokesman, Adam Temple, said a revised ad would begin running on Monday.

The group said on Friday that it would withdraw the ad after it was told that it erroneously tied Kane to “a weak plea deal” in a 2007 rape case. Kane’s campaign distributed statements by the victim’s father and a prosecutor saying she had no role in the sentencing or plea.

The ad, which began airing on Thursday, continued to run over the weekend on TV stations in the Philadelphia area.

A second claim in the ad accuses Kane of “going soft” in the 2005 prosecution of what it calls a 16-year-old’s rapist. The defendant pleaded guilty to indecent assault forcible compulsion and corruption of minors — both misdemeanors that do not necessarily amount to the same elements of the crime of rape, Jarbola said.

The national group did not acknowledge any mistake. Rather, it tried to blame Kane.

In a statement on Monday, Temple said Kane “has further weakened her credibility by letting others take responsibility for cases where court records show she was the attorney.” Jarbola called that claim “baloney,” and Kane’s campaign accused the group of running “vicious and unsubstantiated attacks.” The election is Nov. 6.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.