ShareThis Page
High court candidates shatter campaign contribution record |

High court candidates shatter campaign contribution record

The Associated Press
| Friday, October 23, 2015 9:36 p.m

HARRISBURG, Pa. — Political contributions to candidates competing for an unprecedented three open seats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court surpassed the $10 million mark, according to campaign finance reports filed Friday.

The fundraising total far exceeds that of any previous election for the high court; candidates in 2007 raised about $7 million.

Contributions through mid-September, including six candidates eliminated in the May primary, totaled $8.2 million. The latest reports pushed the figure to about $10.5 million.

Democrats continued to out-raise Republicans.

Philadelphia Judge Kevin Dougherty, a Democrat whose support from organized labor has enabled him to lead the field in fundraising, reported $1.3 million in contributions. Overall, he has raised $3.6 million and spent $2.9 million since the beginning of the year.

No information of Dougherty’s individual contributors or expenditures was available.

Fellow Democrat David Wecht, a state Superior Court judge from Pittsburgh, reported about $780,000 in contributions in the most recent period. They included $450,000 from the Committee for a Better Tomorrow, a political action committee operated by the Philadelphia Trial Lawyers Association, and $100,000-plus from the Teamsters union’s political committee and several of its locals. Overall, he has raised $2.9 million and spent $2.1 million.

Democrat Christine Donohue, a Superior Court judge from Pittsburgh, reported contributions of more than $838,455, which pushed her total to $1.8 million. She had nearly $495,000 on hand.

Among the Republicans, Commonwealth Court Judge Anne Covey reported nearly $250,000 in contributions, pushing her total to nearly $744,000. She had about $359,000 on hand as of Monday.

Judy Olson, a Superior Court judge from Pittsburgh, reported contributions of nearly $178,000 for a total of $447,000 and had about $258,000 on hand.

Adams County Judge Mike George took in less than $90,000 in contributions and had about $185,000 on hand.

Paul Panepinto, a Philadelphia judge and former Republican who is running as an independent, reported $22,500 in contributions and a balance of $154,000.

Categories: Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.