Kane, Freed to take AG race to the airwaves |

Kane, Freed to take AG race to the airwaves

The Associated Press

HARRISBURG — With two weeks left in the campaign, Democrat Kathleen Kane is airing her first TV commercial in the general election race for Pennsylvania attorney general, and Republican David Freed is poised to follow suit.

Kane’s ad began airing statewide on Monday, the same day the two candidates squared off for their only scheduled debate, campaign spokesman Josh Morrow said on Tuesday.

In the 30-second spot, the narrator calls Kane “a prosecutor, not a politician” and says she’ll “clean up the corruption in Harrisburg.” A spokesman for Freed’s campaign said on Tuesday that it plans to make “a robust ad purchase” this week.

“We’re looking forward to introducing Dave Freed to the electorate. We expect a spirited remaining two weeks of the race,” said the spokesman, Tim Kelly.

Kane, who worked as a Lackawanna County prosecutor for more than 12 years, relied heavily on TV advertising to elevate her name recognition and attack her primary opponent, former U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy, in her victorious campaign last spring.

Freed, Cumberland County’s elected district attorney, was unopposed for the GOP nomination, and did not need to run TV ads.

In Monday night’s debate at Widener University Law School in Harrisburg, Kane described herself as politically independent and suggested Freed used his political connections to lock up the nomination.

Freed rebutted the charge and said his managerial experience in running the district attorney’s office makes him the stronger candidate.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.