Kane received sensitive emails on personal account |

Kane received sensitive emails on personal account

The Associated Press
Brad Bumsted | Trib Total Media
Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane arrives to be processed and arraigned on Saturday, Aug. 8, 2015, at the Montgomery County detective bureau in Norristown.

NORRISTOWN — Pennsylvania’s top prosecutor received sensitive emails from aides about news coverage of her office on personal accounts, preventing investigators from seeing many of her responses, according to a document obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane was charged this month with obstruction and conspiracy for allegedly leaking grand jury material to the Philadelphia Daily News and then lying about it.

An affidavit seeking a search warrant in April shows that Kane had received some emails from top aides on her private AOL and Yahoo accounts. They included proposed responses to questions from a Philadelphia Inquirer reporter who worked on an article critical of Kane as well as links to the Daily News article the day it appeared in June 2014.

Kane, who has maintained her innocence, told a grand jury investigating the leak in November that she didn’t read the article until August 2014.

“The attorney general receives a large volume of emails on a daily basis and has to prioritize the ones most immediately pressing,” said Kane’s spokesman, Chuck Ardo. “It is highly probable that she never got to go back and read the email in question.”

The office does not have a policy preventing employees from conducting official business on personal computers and electronic devices, or from using their personal email accounts, Ardo said.

Investigators seeking the search warrant said Kane’s use of personal email accounts and the limited scope of emails provided by the leak grand jury prevented them from seeing many of her responses.

Prosecutors say Kane leaked a confidential transcript and memorandum related to a 2009 grand jury investigation to smear two prosecutors.

In one exchange included in the search warrant, Kane’s then-spokeswoman attached a copy of the Daily News article and said, “need some help on this.” It’s unclear whether Kane responded. The spokeswoman instructed a colleague on how to respond to a reporter asking about the article: “No comment. That’s it. No background, no explaining, no comment.”

Investigators were seeking additional emails, electronic calendars for Kane and her top aides, and recordings and transcripts of interviews related to the investigation covered in the Daily News article.

A judge approved the warrants and the Attorney General’s Office turned over several discs of additional material. None of it was included with the documents obtained Wednesday.

“I’m sure the attorney general has communications with all kinds of people through a variety of means,” Ardo said.

Other search warrant documents remain under seal, prosecutors said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.