Lawsuit against Pennsylvania Gov. Corbett’s Medicaid program overhaul say it could hurt poor |

Lawsuit against Pennsylvania Gov. Corbett’s Medicaid program overhaul say it could hurt poor

The Associated Press

HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Corbett’s plan to overhaul Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program is being mishandled and, in less than 10 days, could cause serious medical problems for people who are cut off from crucial health care benefits, lawyers for the poor argued Monday in a court challenge.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Philadelphia, seeks to halt the diversion of Medicaid enrollees into new plans with limits designed for healthier adult Medicaid enrollees.

The filing was made before the Jan. 1 effective date for the Corbett administration’s plan to restructure benefits in the health care program that serves 1.1 million adults. Including the expansion of Medicaid’s guidelines under the 2010 federal law, Corbett’s plan establishes three benefit levels to replace the 14 in effect. Each Medicaid enrollee would be sorted into a benefit level based on their relative health and income.

But Community Legal Services of Philadelphia and the National Health Law Program said reductions in benefits designed for working-age, able-bodied adults are being imposed without adequate notice or clear standards, and they asked a federal judge to stop the plan from taking effect until these concerns are addressed.

The complaint was filed on behalf of two Philadelphia residents.

Melissa Mendez, 33, is applying for Medicaid coverage. She was told she would be assigned to a plan that does not include dental benefits, even though she has three broken teeth in need of repair after a fall in October that fractured her jaw.

The other plaintiff, Aminata Diao, 37, has a history of mental illness, suffers from depression and asthma, and is recovering from an injured back. She was assigned to a plan that does not meet her needs even though she seems to qualify for a broader benefits package, Community Legal Services said.

“This is a system that nobody really understands how it works, the standards have not been made public, people got notices they didn’t understand, or didn’t get notices at all in some cases, and in the process, people are going to lose benefits that they really need on January 1,” said Kristen Dama, a lawyer for Community Legal Services.

The system violates the Social Security Act and constitutional guarantees of due process, the lawsuit said.

In a statement, the Corbett administration said it disagrees with the lawsuit’s allegations and that it will work to avoid confusion or disruption of service. People can be enrolled in a different plan if their medical needs demand it, the Department of Human Services said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.