Archive

ShareThis Page
Measure to cut painkiller abuse moves forward in Pennsylvania Legislature | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Measure to cut painkiller abuse moves forward in Pennsylvania Legislature

Legislation to require practitioners to prescribe narcotic painkillers electronically is on its way to the state Senate.

House Bill 353 received the full support of the House on Tuesday. The bill would require all prescriptions for Schedule II, III, and IV controlled substances to be transmitted directly to pharmacies.

The bill aims to prevent fraud or theft by updating a law from the 1990s that requires opioid prescriptions to be handwritten. Electronic, fax and over-the-phone prescriptions are already used for some medications.

Electronic prescriptions are a “simple, common-sense thing to do” to cut down on fraud and to help stem the opioid abuse epidemic, said Rep. Tedd Nesbit, R-Mercer County, the bill sponsor.

The proposal says practitioners would not need to adhere to e-prescribing rules in certain circumstances, including under technology outages, when an out-of-state pharmacy is filling the prescription or when the patient is being treated in an emergency department or health care facility where e-prescribing would cause an untimely delay in treatment.

Nesbit said e-prescribing would also mean prescription information would go directly into the state’s prescription drug-monitoring database.

Westmoreland County saw a spike in drug overdose deaths in 2016, and the trend is expected to continue in 2017, officials say. Roughly 70 percent of heroin users start out using prescription drugs, according to the attorney general’s office.

Kevin Zwick is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2856, [email protected] or via Twitter @kevinjzwick.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.