Obama, Christie try to swing Philly region’s gubernatorial vote |

Obama, Christie try to swing Philly region’s gubernatorial vote

The Associated Press

BLUE BELL — President Obama and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie dropped in on Pennsylvania on Sunday to try to influence the gubernatorial campaign in the race’s waning days and motivate voters in what is a relatively sleepy midterm election in the state.

Democrat Tom Wolf, a first-time candidate who ran his family business for nearly three decades, is trying to knock off Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, a conservative former state and federal prosecutor who is seeking a second term after stumbling through his first four years. In particular, Corbett has struggled to explain budget-balancing cuts in aid to public schools in 2011 at the same time he cut business taxes.

Wolf has led steadily in polls, although Corbett’s campaign appears to be making up ground with voters by claiming that Wolf is secretly planning a major middle-class tax increase. Wolf has said he intends no such thing and plans to restructure the state income tax rate to shift a bigger burden to higher earners. Meanwhile, with news of Obama’s visit, Corbett’s campaign has added a second prong to its attack, telling voters in a new TV ad that Wolf will advance Obama’s agenda.

The ad tries to capitalize on Obama’s sagging popularity — two recent independent polls show that just one in three voters surveyed say he’s doing a good job — and it quotes first lady Michelle Obama during her Oct. 15 visit to a Philadelphia rally for Wolf: “If we truly want to finish what we started, then we need to elect Tom Wolf as governor of Pennsylvania.”

Obama appeared on Temple University’s campus with Wolf in the evening. Meanwhile, Corbett visited churches in Lancaster County in the morning and dropped by campaign offices and diners in Philadelphia’s suburbs before his meet-up in Ivyland on Sunday night with Christie, head of the Republican Governors Association and a potential presidential candidate.

At a campaign stop in Blue Bell, a few miles outside Philadelphia, Corbett went into a crowded campaign office to shake hands with volunteers there making phone calls to lists of registered voters.

“We’re going to win this,” Corbett told them. “We are definitely going to win this.”

Pollsters are projecting turnout to be lower than in past midterm elections; turnout was slightly above 50 percent of registered voters in 2006 and about 47 percent in 2010.

Christie has been to Pennsylvania to campaign or fundraise with Corbett at least four times in the last few months. Obama’s stop in Philadelphia was an attempt to motivate the city’s huge Democratic voting base that tends to have less impact in midterm elections. In 2010, just 40 percent of registered Philadelphians cast a ballot.

Corbett is deeply unpopular in Philadelphia, whether because of his first budget that delivered a heavy blow to the city’s financially troubled schools or his signature on a tough voter identification bill that ultimately was struck down in court. To a large degree, the gubernatorial election will be won or lost in Philadelphia and its four suburban counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery. Pennsylvania has nearly 8.3 million registered voters, and one in three lives in Philadelphia or its suburban counties.

High turnout in Philadelphia, the state’s largest city, would favor Wolf, with Democrats making up almost 80 percent of the city’s 1 million-plus registered voters.

The candidate who wins Philadelphia’s four suburban counties, a crucial swing area of 1.6 million voters, is nearly assured of a victory. Beginning with the 2000 election, all but one candidate for U.S. Senate, governor and president who has won Pennsylvania also carried Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery counties. The exception was Republican Sen. Pat Toomey in 2010.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.